• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Christian Action League

Defending North Carolina Families and Christian Heritage

  • Home
  • About CAL
    • Our Director
    • Statement of Faith
  • Connect
  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Pro Life
  • Marriage
  • 1st Amendment
  • Alcohol
  • Gambling
  • Marijuana
  • Rev. Creech’s Commentary
  • Other Issues
You are here: Home / Featured / BREAKING: Court Rules that Voter ID Can Move Forward in North Carolina

BREAKING: Court Rules that Voter ID Can Move Forward in North Carolina

By Joseph Kyzer
Office of NC House Speaker Tim Moore
July 19, 2019

RALEIGH – A bipartisan three-judge panel ruled Friday that voter ID implementation can move forward in North Carolina and dismissed all but one of the plaintiffs’ six claims in a legal challenge to legislation implementing a constitutional amendment approved by voters last Fall.

Thirty-four other states have some form of voter ID law. North Carolina is the last state in the Southeast to start requiring some form of voter ID.

State House Speaker Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) sponsored the voter ID constitutional amendment and said its implementing law was a model for balancing election integrity with accommodations for all voters.

“North Carolinians know election integrity is essential to our democratic process and strongly supported voter ID,” Speaker Moore said. “This law accommodates all voters’ access to a secure ballot with common sense standards already in place in most states.”

The case – Holmes v. Moore – is a state court challenge brought by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice in Wake County. The court denied the plaintiffs’ requests for a preliminary injunction.

North Carolina’s voter ID law allows any voter to assert a “reasonable impediment” at the polls for why they don’t have a qualifying ID.
It further accommodates religious objectors, provides for free state-issued IDs, and accepts a broad range of qualifying IDs including student IDs, drivers’ licenses, passports, military and veteran IDs, voter and state employee cards, and Native American tribal cards. S.B. 824 even allows drivers’ licenses from other states to qualify in some circumstances.

Governor Roy Cooper’s vetoed the legislation – Senate Bill 824 Implementation of Voter ID Const. Amendment – accusing a majority of North Carolina voters of “sinister” motives in supporting a constitutional amendment proposing voter ID and calling the people’s approval of voter ID the “cynical origins” of the law.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Featured, Voter Education Tagged With: constitutional amendment, Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed, Holmes v. Moore, Joseph Kyzer, Office of NC House Speaker Tim Moore, Rep. Tim Moore, SB 824, SB 824-Implementation of Voter ID Const. Amendment, voter ID

Primary Sidebar

Archives

Cartoons

More Cartoons

Legislative Wrap-ups

RSS ONN News

  • Boys' and girls' toy, clothes sections could land CA stores $1K fine
  • Lincoln Project no longer comrades of the Left
  • McFarland: Don't hold your breath for ERLC reform
  • Blackburn: Dem colleagues openly push to censor news
  • Harvard logic: Let's invite failed UN leader to commencement

Verse of the Day

Click here to visit BRC News

Copyright © 2021 Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc · Web Design by OptimusMedia.com · Log in